Antitrust Policy Notice
Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the
intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable
antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to
meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited
under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in
connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust
Policy available at linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these
matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux
Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP,
which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.
List of attendees
- Pascal Willbrink
- Sander Jansen
- Aliou Diaite
- Jean-Etienne Lemaire
1 - Review of the meeting report of November
Proposal of November report.
2 - Review of actions
60 - Discussion on the addition of OMICRON as a member of the TSC and what about GE of which we have no more news
=> Action Frédéric, have a discussion on this with Lucian
=> Organize a meeting between GE/Alliander/RTE TSC members. Sander sends his availability by email and Frédéric sends a doodle to GE
=> Doodle done, no answer from GE.
Sander wants to merge OpenSCD and compas
Question : why keep GE when they are not involved?
Answer : Aliou contacts Boris and Lucian for discussion about GE involvement (new voting session could be organize to choose TSC members)
=> U: John Metric will contact GE team (action taken during TAC meeting on June 13th).
=> U : For OMICRON and TRANSNET, Sander told Ben to make proposition for their integration (Not a priority for now).
=> U : Ben did a proposition and Sander has contacted Jackobs (some limitation and timeless are encountered)
=> U : Sander ask to GE but no answer
=> U : follow but not active participation (GE), own lf projet for omicron
63 - Discuss the current state of COMPAS and analyze the gap to reach the next level to decide whether or not we would like to reach it before the June TAC meeting
=> Action for all,
=> U : Not a priority
=> U: Remaining lot of work and team is focused on other subject.
=> Followup during the meetup in Paris
3 - Review of Growth plan actions
67 - Action RTE from previous TSC : Study to make a presentation during an identified event as for exemple IEC 61850 week in october
=> U : to be scheduled
=> U : should do more to promote SCT
=> Followup during the meetup in Paris
72 - Community call organization
=> U : not a big success, try to have more people involved by promoting (LinkedIn, mailing list, slack)
=> U: discussion on organization is held. Ben & Sander & Aliou will discuss about it.
=> U : It seems to be difficult to involve more people, Ben ask Dan Brown for proposition. We will keep communication by different way for promotion (webinar for exemple)
=> discusssions are going on
73 - Juan lefts TSC (votes 4 in Favour), new member should be elected in October TSC meeting.
=> U: not yet
=> Pascal is voted in as new CoMPAS TSC member (3/3 of the voting member said yes)
4 - Roadmap program review
74 - Get feedbacks from Juan and Ben, throught their last actions about roadmap.
=> U : Juan pushed new macro (format) of the roadmap (more visual friendly) in Confluence.
=> U : Sander will make some updates
=> Alliander plans for Q1
- Ability to build a full modulair OpenSCD distribution (load 3th party openSCD-plugins: sprinteins, substation editor, template selector, locamation plug-in)
- Documentation OpenSCD up-to-date including: User manual; API descriptions; Website live (including this documentation)
- Plug-in template (OpenSCD)
- App store experiments (distribution generator / app store)
75 - Should we planified a meeting in order to evaluate roadmap identified actions ?
=> U : half year roadmap review will be scheduled.
=> U : Yearly Meetup also will be scheduled (roadmap could be reviewed on that occasion). Dates should be choosen.
76 - Try to get a plan for relaeses and SSF Badges
=> U : Not a priority, should be checked again next year in order to meet all Early Adoption Stage requirements.
=> Put on the meetup agenda
77 - Documentation, get feedbacks ?
=> U : Architecture repository should be updated (SITIPE added)
=> U : SCT quick start program should be updated also
79 - Jean-Etienne should update roadmap (SCT)
=> U: on going
80 - Meet-Up to be organized by RTE (for all with OpenSCD, November could be good)
=> U : schedule by doodle discuss on program :
=> U : Spend time in order to have an agenda
81 - Reorganization of documents should be done because too much repo
=> U : technical central place is studied by openscd
questions are : What to document? where to document? What tool do it well? What are common practices to have?
=> U : Pascal prepare a small overview
=> U : Swap send video to Jean-Etienne for review
Sources for documentation:
Developer docs (close to the code)
End-user documentation
Idea: using the pipelines above: generate the website and documentation
5 - Open discussion
- Tool for TSC meeting presentation and reports (Confluence ?)
=> U : will be tested on December TSC
- Is our organization for issue tracking and realization good ? Should/Could we think about common sprint from common issues ?
=> Actions defined during meetup could help
Issues · com-pas/contributing (github.com)